Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report clears Blair
Herald Sun ^ | 7-15-04

Posted on 07/15/2004 12:10:15 PM PDT by Indy Pendance

AN official British inquiry yesterday lambasted the state of pre-war intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction.

But the inquiry found Prime Minister Tony Blair had not deliberately misled the nation into going to war.

Mr Blair immediately accepted responsibility for any mistakes, but insisted the US-led war to remove Iraqi president Saddam Hussein last year had been justified.

"Iraq, the region, the wider world is a better and safer place without Saddam," he said.

Mr Blair said that while it seemed "increasingly clear" Saddam might not have had weapons of mass destruction ready to deploy before the war, that did not make the conflict wrong.

The report from a panel headed by former top civil servant Lord Robin Butler found Britain joined the war based on evidence that was at times seriously flawed and unreliable.

A government dossier on WMDs, published in September 2002, showed "no evidence of deliberate distortion or of culpable negligence", the inquiry concluded.

But the 196-page re port, seen as crucial to the future of Mr Blair as Prime Minister, contained serious rebuffs.

The most notable concluded that Iraq almost certainly did not have significant stocks of WMDs before the war.

Voters in two cities get an early chance to pass judgment on the report.

Birmingham and Leicester South, Labour Party strongholds with large Muslim communities, will today vote in by-elections which will test the waters ahead of a probable general election next year.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: butlerreport; tonyblair; wmd

1 posted on 07/15/2004 12:10:17 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

The local all news radio station "reported" that this report was "blistering." It seems to be anything but.



And, the network affiliation of that radio station?????




Yup. You knew it already; CBS.


2 posted on 07/15/2004 12:20:42 PM PDT by LiberationIT (Michael Moore; Barney for Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
When I saw the headline, I thought it was going to be about Jayson Blair. ;O)
3 posted on 07/15/2004 12:27:51 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberationIT

"The most notable concluded that Iraq almost certainly did not have significant stocks of WMDs before the war. "

Can someone please tell me how much is a significant amount in terms of human life? If one sarin shell can kill 25000 in a NY subway is that considered a significant loss of life?

Maybe a shell can get brought to Boston for the convention. After it explodes they can all blame Bush for allowing WMD to leave Iraq.






4 posted on 07/15/2004 12:28:02 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Hitler? Stalin? The left has a tough decision as to who they would rather emulate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

No fault screw-ups.


5 posted on 07/15/2004 1:44:53 PM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all Things Truth Beareth Away the Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson