Posted on 07/14/2004 7:15:20 PM PDT by xzins
After today's vote, all that matters is that he's retiring.
We have a "ha,ha" majority in the Senate now and a fat lot of good it does us.We need numbers,LARGE numbers,and with them,we can not only squash the Dems,but make the RINOS work with us. You really haven't a clue about politics.It's time you learned how things work,instead of making believe that you are some sort of "expert".
I believe you've had a few too many.
Your last post makes no sense.
Enjoy the party.
X
Time to shovel the manure out of the GOP -- RINOs are stinkin' up the Party.
I don't engage in such spurious and specious insults and flaming;however,for you,I'll make the rares exception.
You are unable to comprehend my cogent post,because you've fried your brains on far too much dope and drinking all that bathtub booze hasn't helped you much either,pal.
Go get someone,who understandxs the written English word to explain what I wrote to you,in simpler terms.I tried to make is as easy as possible,but unfortunately,my prose is still far above your reading level.;^)
Oh c'mon now. Don't know it's better that Kerry get into office and have unlimited abortions, racial preferences gone crazy, borderless Texas, and the world's AIDS patients?
And a Dem majority in both Houses as well.Life would be so grand and glorious then. (/sarcasm)
and electing SCOTUS judges.
Savage must be getting a touch of the syphillitic dementia when coming to the President. Otherwise, he's entertaining. The Howard Stern loons who march like the I Robots because Howie can't talk about crotches well now! The election is not that far away. I'm convinced that no matter how much Savage may talk about Constitution Party or any another, that most people will vote for the President.
What's the point of having 2 parties? And why are all the Dems so lock-step in favor of gay marriage? I don't get it. Would Dems in the 50s have voted for gay marriage? I don't think so. Why are they all voting for it now?
What was the republican senators' excuse for not voting?
McCain is still a republican. Why is that? He's a social lib.
One or the other party will win. But I personally feel that the two beltway party days are numbered. As more and more people feel disenfranchised, and screwed, eventually they'll have real competition. I give the two beltway parties another presidential cycle or two, and by then, they will have pissed off enough people to put them out of a job....It's not "if" it will happen, it's just a matter of "when" it will happen.
And WHY did Zell Miller never become a Republican? He is much more a GOPer,than he is a Dem.
I'd rather listen to Savage any day, than the likes of Hannity's "Radio Disney"....
His lame excuse is that his family are all democrats and he's always been a democrat and dems weren't always liberal. BTW, him speaking at the pubbie convention will be interesting. Not as interesting as Ron Reagan Jr. OR OR OR Barack Obama the keynote! GOOD LORD.
In the end, they'll be responsible for creating a party the put's them right out of business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.