Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

a clip from the article linked above:



The Kerry team clearly recognized the possibility that they were causing significant harm, because they added a loophole. If a U.S. multinational produces a product in a foreign country for consumption in that country, then they will continue to allow the firm to avoid U.S. tax until the money is mailed back home.



Think of all of the needless and duplicative activity this will generate. Multinationals will be forced, in pursuit of tax savings, to introduce newer and smaller production facilities in every country they serve. Transportation costs are low enough, and scale economies large enough, that most multinationals operate a few production facilities located in attractive hubs around the world.



So why would anyone propose such a thing? Some industries, like food production, already operate that way. Because of local food regulations, and concerns about spoilage, it is often the case that food companies locate a separate plant in each country that they serve. Chief among these is Heinz, which owns 57 plants outside of North America that, as the company states, "provide products to consumers in those markets."


48 posted on 07/14/2004 6:31:52 PM PDT by GROOVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GROOVY

Is this something for which he could be impeached from the Senate, or is it just Senate business as usual?


54 posted on 07/14/2004 6:57:49 PM PDT by reformedliberal (Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson