Posted on 07/14/2004 10:38:29 AM PDT by jmc813
You may not have heard of the American Community Survey, but you will. The national census, which historically is taken every ten years, has expanded to quench the federal bureaucracys ever-growing thirst to govern every aspect of American life. The new survey, unlike the traditional census, is taken each and every year at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars. And its not brief. It contains 24 pages of intrusive questions concerning matters that simply are none of the governments business, including your job, your income, your physical and emotional heath, your family status, your dwelling, and your intimate personal habits.
The questions are both ludicrous and insulting. The survey asks, for instance, how many bathrooms you have in your house, how many miles you drive to work, how many days you were sick last year, and whether you have trouble getting up stairs. It goes on and on, mixing inane questions with highly detailed inquiries about your financial affairs. One can only imagine the countless malevolent ways our federal bureaucrats could use this information. At the very least the survey will be used to dole out pork, which is reason enough to oppose it.
Keep in mind the survey is not voluntary, nor is the Census Bureau asking politely. Americans are legally obligated to answer, and can be fined up to $1,000 per question if they refuse!
I introduced an amendment last week that would have eliminated funds for this intrusive survey in a spending bill, explaining on the House floor that perhaps the American people dont appreciate being threatened by Big Brother. The amendment was met by either indifference or hostility, as most members of Congress either dont care about or actively support government snooping into the private affairs of citizens.
One of the worst aspects of the census is its focus on classifying people by race. When government tells us it wants information to help any given group, it assumes every individual who shares certain physical characteristics has the same interests, or wants the same things from government. This is an inherently racist and offensive assumption. The census, like so many federal policies and programs, inflames racism by encouraging Americans to see themselves as members of racial groups fighting each other for a share of the federal pie.
The census also represents a form of corporate welfare, since the personal data collected on hundred of millions of Americans can be sold to private businesses. Surely business enjoys having such extensive information available from one source, but its hardly the duty of taxpayers to subsidize the cost of market research.
At least the national census has its origins in the Constitution, which is more than one can say about the vast majority of programs funded by Congress. Still, Article I makes it clear that the census should be taken every ten years for the sole purpose of congressional redistricting (and apportionment of taxes, prior to the disastrous 16th amendment). This means a simple count of the number of people living in a given area, so that numerically equal congressional districts can be maintained. The founders never authorized the federal government to continuously survey the American people.
More importantly, they never envisioned a nation where the people would roll over and submit to every government demand. The American Community Survey is patently offensive to all Americans who still embody that fundamental American virtue, namely a healthy mistrust of government. The information demanded in the new survey is none of the governments business, and the American people should insist that Congress reject it now before it becomes entrenched.
That's it! That is where I draw the line. Let 'em try to fine me. I'll take it to court, and we'll see who wins.
Would the Repubs please. . .get the Leftist-Democrats off our Government payroll!
Wouldn't putting down things like NYOB or "more than 0 and less than 100,000,000,000,000,000" count as answers? Just answer with as little info as possible or as vague as possible.
The law says you have to respond to all questions, so what if I made a few mistakes. Are the correct answers that important?
Any Freepers receive the survey?
Other than the number of people in my home it's none of their business.
"Would the Repubs please. . .get the Leftist-Democrats off our Government payroll!"
I agree. And a big sweep to clear the State Department of 'em.
I have told a traditional census taker to step off.
I will do the same for these newfangled intrusions.
Q: "How many bathrooms you have in your house?"
A: Enough to keep me happy, but not enough to keep my relatives or visitors happy.
Q: How many miles you drive to work?
A: A couple thousand a year.
Q: How many days you were sick last year?
A: Practically every day I am sick of something.
Q: Do you have trouble getting up stairs?
A: Of course. Especially when carrying large heavy objects.
Ron Paul Bump.
BTTT, I'd like to know too.
Can we clone this guy? I want a Ron Paul of my own.
Q: "How many bathrooms you have in your house?"
A: DEFINE BATHROOM (EEYOOOO!)
Q: How many miles you drive to work?
A: DEFINE WORK (IF YOU ENJOY IT, IS IT REALLY WORK?; IF NOT SEE NEXT QUESTION)
Q: How many days you were sick last year?
A: DEFINE SICK (SEE ALSO: "HEALTH OF THE MOTHER")
Q: Do you have trouble getting up stairs?
A: ONLY AT 3AM AFTER THE BARS HAVE CLOSED
The Census hated me.
Under "race" I put "other". Then filled in the blank with "Human".
Bad news. This is outright communist totalitarianism. I thought Stalin was dead? The entire voting public must be made aware of this and shoot this pup down and send it to the ash bin of history. This type of thing belongs in North Korea, not the USA. Where do these people come from?
actually, thank God we don't. One Ron Paul is more than enough. any more and we might as well curl up and die because he's worse than John Kerry when it came to supporting our troops or taking on Saddam Hussein. Basically he's a nutball when it comes to anything except taxes but the only losertarian who's ever made anything of himself and basically the conservative equivalent of Bernie Sanders (Vermont Socialist) on the other side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.