Yep, and we can have polyhomo unions too.
I remember when the gay 'purists' debated the bi-sexuals in the 1980s. The 'purists' semmed to win a the time, but we all know how that one turned out.
Many homosexuals do not want to be limited to one partner anyway. Most have 100-500 in their lifetimes, and some over 1000. Allowing them marriage will not stop that tendency.
Jonathan Yarborough, a Canadian citizen, ventured to Massachusetts to “reaffirm his legal Canadian ‘marriage’” with his partner Cody Rogahn. When asked about marriage, Yarborough offered this startling assessment, saying, “I think it’s possible to love more than one partner, not in the polygamist sense . . . In our case, it is, we have an open marriage.”
The redefinition of terms out of existence continues, as now the word “polygamy” need not uniformly apply to anyone who is married to more than one person (“poly”), at least according to Yarborough.
[...]
http://www.reclaimamerica.org/Pages/News/newspage.asp?story=1735
It's strange that homosexuals recoil at the term "polygamy," when they see nothing wrong in having multiple relations. It's awfully hypocritical for them to pass "moral" judgment on heterosexual polygamy.
I saw a representative of the Human Rights Campaign debating Jay Sekelow on C-Span yesterday. She was offended that anyone would say gay marriage will lead to legalized polygamy. There she was, passing her moral judgment on another group wanting marriage. It was entirely inconsistent with her argument about marriage for all.