Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hunter112
If you really want to fix heterosexual marriage, and in-wedlock birth rates, why is targeting homosexuals part of the solution?

Why add a dysfunctional sex fetish as a solution? Wouldn't that be teaching the children to go the wrong way? Shouldn't we be reinforcing normal heterosexual behavior to strengthen marriage rather than belittling it and turning it into nothing but a bath house orgy?

296 posted on 07/14/2004 1:29:23 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]


To: concerned about politics
Why add a dysfunctional sex fetish as a solution? Wouldn't that be teaching the children to go the wrong way?

I guess this is where we differ. I really don't think any amount of "teaching" would have made my fellow boys in gym class any more attractive to me. I still was more fixated on what went on in the girls' locker room, but the cement block walls were too strong for even my X-ray vision.

Tolerance of even voluntary behaviors is not endorsement of them. When we tolerate people of different political views, religions, or cultural practices, we do not actively encourage them. Homosexuals do not need permission to feel the way they do about members of their own gender. They've done it repeatedly throughout history, even when the penalties of getting caught were much more Draconian than any of us here would countenance.

322 posted on 07/14/2004 2:08:59 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson