Posted on 07/14/2004 9:50:28 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
Edited on 07/14/2004 10:13:18 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I have no problem with your statement, or with his favorite philospher. I rather liked that response (Bush's) by the way. However, the idea that there'd be no aristocracy, that the gov't would be by the people, for the people, was inspired by French revolutionary philosophy. I think my original statement was that the const. was based upon Christian ideals and french philosophy - are we arguing here?
Looks like it, mb. I really suggest you either dig into those links I sent you, or pick up a copy of On Revolution, by Hannah Arendt. (How about both? ;-)
We need a protest warrior-esq sign to flash during the kerry/backwards "rallies".
"kerry/edwards: We are HAPPY!"
"Loooove not children"
"Protect Judges, promoting happy couples"
"Democrats for Happiness"
"got next Generation?"
I don't know some help folks, something to keep this issue going to novemeber and beyond.
American Revolution: every person has a right to be treated with respect.
French Revolution: every person has the right to treat everyone with disrespect.
just a humor note.
What a ridiculous question... Are you pro-missionary position or pro-fellatio? What adults do in their own bedrooms is their own business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.