[CSM]

Nice circular logic. There is no intellectual honesty when you compare making a current legal activity between consenting adults with a current illegal activity causing harm to a non consenting adult.

But, then you knew that already.

[robertpaulsen]

"But, then you knew that already."

I knew that would be your argument, yes. I knew you would totally miss the point, yes.

[tpaine]

CSM:
"So you would waste your time fighting a legal activity instead of protecting your little dog, nephew or daughter from evil individuals? Nice of you to openly state your priorities!"

_______________________________________


Let's make it legal to steal your property.

You, of couse, have the right to defend it by any legal means necessary. But we get to keep it if we take it.
You want to live that way? Is that your priority?
690 robertpaulsen

___________________________________________


Nice circular logic.

There is no intellectual honesty when you compare making a current legal activity between consenting adults with a current illegal activity causing harm to a non consenting adult.

But, then you knew that already.
694 csm


______________________________________


You comment that paulsen uses dishonest arguments; -- I agree, -- now you're back defending paulsen?

Whatever.