To: Robert_Paulson2
I don't see why you are against women, children and animals having the right of not being hurt by perverts reading a porn how to article.
597 posted on
07/14/2004 4:28:17 PM PDT by
swampfox98
(We are at war! We have been at war since 9/11. How smart do you have to be to understand this?)
To: swampfox98
"Do not emanate into the penumbra."
-sign in Clarence Thomas' office.
603 posted on
07/14/2004 4:38:17 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: swampfox98
I don't see why you are against women, children and animals having the right of not being hurt by perverts reading a porn how to article. As strawmen go, this is a pretty weak one. Nobody on this thread is in favor of women, children or animals being forced to do anything.
I've tried this before, but I'll give it one more shot: The only pornography that is legal is pornography involving consenting adults. The only way it can be legally viewed is by other consenting adults.
649 posted on
07/14/2004 7:15:08 PM PDT by
Modernman
("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
To: swampfox98
I'm not you dolt.
Blaming "harm to women and children" on magazines, movies and art, instead of on the criminals that commit such crimes whether or not they use porn... is STUPID.
How can you be so dense?
674 posted on
07/14/2004 10:34:59 PM PDT by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: swampfox98
"I don't see why you are against women, children and animals having the right of not being hurt by perverts reading a porn how to article."
When did you quit beating your wife?
680 posted on
07/15/2004 6:12:23 AM PDT by
CSM
("The Democrat Cocktail: Ketchup with a Chaser." by JennysCool (7/7/04))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson