With all due respect, Joe, you're ducking the question. You're the one who's advocating governmental action.
As a conservative, I believe in as small a government as possible. I'm no anarchist, though - don't get me wrong. I do believe that a government is itself necessary and very proper. I just don't want that government involved where is doesn't belong.
We are talking about the government taking a assertive action - banning porn. You indicated that to do so was the "will of the people." My response is that the people want to do lots of crazy things that we shouldn't get the government involved with.
Porn might not be to your taste, it might not be to mine, but I see no reason why aesthetics should lead to us giving the government more power over what types of books and magazines adults read, or what types of movies they watch.
As a citizen, I sure would like to have a say-so in my state, or my city, or my community whether or not to allow porn, bookstores, etc.
Unless you're saying that porn should be a protected right, like free speech or freedom from illegal searches and seizures. That wherever I go, I have to accept it? Freedom for thee but not for me?