Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/13/2004 8:55:26 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus

I'll bet we see no "Catholic Ping!"'s on this thread. Another shining moment for the Catholic church.


2 posted on 07/13/2004 10:00:45 PM PDT by richmwill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
The suit alleges Wolsey received $100,000 dollars for a Jersey Shore condo.

I guess we're not talking Stone Harbor.

3 posted on 07/13/2004 10:09:54 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Was Rose's Saint really a scheming sinner?
In God & priest she trusted but suit says man of the cloth duped her out of 500G
Msgr. John Woolsey, the 66-year-old pastor of St. John the Martyr on the upper East Side, is charged in court papers with the 'reprehensible' act of bilking his devout parishioner Rose Cale of nearly $500,000 and using the money to buy a condo (below) on the Jersey Shore.
A respected Manhattan priest swindled a devout elderly parishioner out of nearly $500,000 - and used some of the money to buy himself a Jersey Shore condo, a bombshell lawsuit filed yesterday charges.

Msgr. John Woolsey, 66, pastor of St. John the Martyr Church on the upper East Side, abused his influence as spiritual adviser to the late Rose Cale to satisfy some unholy greed, the lawsuit claims.

"As a Catholic, I am outraged by the conduct at issue in this case," Janet Naegele, executor of Cale's estate, told the Daily News yesterday. "Priests and pastors, who are revered by their parishioners, should not accept large personal gifts from them."

Cale died in January 2003 at 88. But before she passed away, her friend Naegele, a Manhattan accountant, uncovered evidence that the priest was trying to swipe the elderly woman's entire $1.3 million fortune, the suit contends.

The lawsuit also names the Archdiocese of New York as a defendant, claiming Edward Cardinal Egan should bear responsibility for Woolsey's alleged "reprehensible conduct" and establish rules to prevent similar incidents.

"We haven't seen the lawsuit yet, so I can't respond to that," said archdiocesan spokesman Joseph Zwilling.

Zwilling also declined to vouch for Woolsey, saying, "That's between the estate and him."

Woolsey could not be reached for comment last night. Calls left for his attorney, Christopher Houlihan, were not returned.

Parishioners and colleagues of the veteran priest were stunned by the charges.

"He's a very good person," said Laura Aponte, 50, a member of Woolsey's flock. "He wants to help people. I don't think he would take advantage of anyone."

The Rev. Michael Greene added, "I know nothing of the charges. ... I don't want to hear."

The lawsuit, filed yesterday in Manhattan Supreme Court, claims Woolsey bilked Cale of a total of $490,000 in cash and stock, and at one point had her designate him the sole beneficiary of her estate. Cale had inherited her fortune, her estate said.

The lawsuit says Woolsey "exercised undue influence on Miss Cale and was able to manipulate her to his personal gain."

Cale gave Woolsey $100,000 to buy a condo on the Jersey Shore, the suit contends. The priest also got Cale to make $241,500 in charitable donations to St. John the Martyr by telling her the money was needed for expenses, such as replacing the organ, court papers say.

"These representations of material facts by Msgr. Woolsey were false, known by Msgr. Woolsey to be false ... " the lawsuit says, adding that the priest allegedly used Cale's donations for his personal use.

Cale, who never married or bore any children, began attending Woolsey's E. 71st St. church in 1997, upon becoming disillusioned with another parish, said attorney Brian Caplan, who is representing her estate.

Caplan, from the Manhattan law firm Goodkind, Labaton, Rudoff & Sucharow, said Cale lived with her elderly brother on E. 77th St. and attended Mass every day until her death.

She grew close to Woolsey, who showed her more attention than just hearing her confessions and giving her Communion, the lawsuit claims.

"Over time, Msgr. Woolsey interjected himself into Miss Cale's daily affairs of both a personal and a business nature," said the suit, adding that the priest often would dine with Cale and accompany her to medical appointments.

He also would write letters to Cale, signing them "Love, Monsignor Woolsey," the suit contends.

Then, in 1999, Woolsey allegedly told Cale of his "hopes and plans" to buy the condo on the Jersey Shore. She responded by giving him $100,000, according to the suit.

Property records reviewed by The News show Woolsey bought a $100,000 condo in the Channel Club Tower in Monmouth Beach, N.J., in 1999. Caplan said Woolsey has since sold the condo.

Also in 1999, Woolsey got Cale to transfer her stock portfolio with Prudential Securities into an account with both their names that his broker established, according to the suit.

Then, in May 2000, Woolsey allegedly persuaded Cale to write a will naming him the sole beneficiary, the suit claims, adding that church personnel witnessed her signing the document.

The will would have left Cale's 87-year-old brother, Frank, who is frail and nearly deaf, with no means of sustenance except Social Security, the suit claims.

When Naegele found out about the will, she immediately had Cale void it and write another making her the executor, she said.

Naegele said that when she confronted Woolsey about the $490,000 he allegedly took from Cale, the priest told her he accepted only $80,000.

Naegele said yesterday that the case shows how easily "parishioners can ... be manipulated by those individuals from who they seek spiritual guidance, particularly the elderly."

 

 

Father Flim Flam a target
DA to probe 500G 'gift'
Prosecutors have opened an investigation into the East Side priest accused in a lawsuit of sweet-talking a wealthy spinster out of nearly $500,000.

"We are looking into it," Sherry Hunter, a spokeswoman for Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, said yesterday.

A suit filed this week charges Msgr. John Woolsey, 66, with abusing his influence over the late Rose Cale to line his pockets - and buy a Jersey Shore condo - with her cash.

Woolsey had no comment, and one source at St. John the Martyr said the pastor was advised to see a doctor about a heart condition after the news broke.

But the big-bucks scandal swirling around Woolsey was the talk of the parish yesterday, in the pews and from the pulpit.

"Our concern should be, first of all, to pray for monsignor and everyone involved," the Rev. Joseph Baker told worshipers at afternoon Mass.

Outside, the flock was divided.

"I wish I could shout through a megaphone," said Maria Rhodes, 50, who went to the rectory to see Woolsey yesterday after her father died.

"I would proclaim that he's a great priest, a compassionate soul, an extraordinarily decent man. I would stake my life on this man's reputation."

Others were rattled by the lawsuit. "I won't lose my faith but I might lose trust in this church," said Lourdes Tajiri, 66, a St. John's parishioner for more than 40 years.

"I have no children and I was considering giving my estate to this church when I died," Tajiri added. "I'll be reconsidering that now. This has totally shocked me."

The lawsuit, filed by the executor of Cale's estate, claims Woolsey "induced" the trusting octogenarian to give him $490,000 in cash and stocks over three years.

He's accused of using $100,000 to buy a condominium in Monmouth Beach, N.J., in 1999 - a swank property he resold for $276,000 a few months ago, records show.

The lawsuit also names the Archdiocese of New York, which said only that it is "looking into" the allegations.

The Catholic League, however, rushed to Woolsey's defense, mocking the idea that the priest - who once ran the archdiocese's Family Life office - is a conniving hornswoggler.

"It is one thing if a clergyman shakes down a member of his flock, quite another if he takes a gift that has been voluntarily given to him," said Catholic League President William Donohue, a friend of Woolsey.

A St. John's source described Cale as a cantankerous but kind and generous woman who enjoyed a "father-daughter" relationship with Woolsey.

"I once jokingly made a comment asking for $100,000 for repairs to the organ and said if anyone had a check, I'd like to hear from them. She was outside my door immediately, saying, 'Don't take it from anyone else,'" the source said.

"I think [Woolsey] has been imprudent, maybe even stupid, but there is no reason why he could not accept gifts."

Originally published on July 14, 2004


4 posted on 07/14/2004 12:44:41 PM PDT by Coleus (Abraham Lincoln was a trial lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


5 posted on 07/14/2004 12:45:13 PM PDT by Coleus (Abraham Lincoln was a trial lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Heirs that didn't get the lady's dough are pissed off.

Perhaps they should have been as kind to her as her priest was.


10 posted on 07/14/2004 12:57:54 PM PDT by Notwithstanding (Fides et Ratio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Damn Wolsey. I thought Henry VIII had taken care of him. (Oh, wait, that was Thomas More.)


15 posted on 07/14/2004 1:06:21 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I'm thinkin' of a master plan . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

It's amazing to me how many of these priests are able to afford beach homes at the Jersey Shore, or in Long Island. This is the fourth priest I can think of, who got into trouble for other reasons, where this info came out about them. In the other cases I'm talking about, the priests molested their victims at their beach homes. So much for those vows of chastity and poverty.


22 posted on 07/14/2004 1:28:51 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

My parents' parish ...


25 posted on 07/14/2004 2:10:28 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Msgr. Woolsey is not the only NY area priest to be guilty of such conduct. This is nothing new. However Cardinal Edward (fast eddie) Egan is showing thta he certainly has on big pair of cahones to claim that Woolsey is an "independant contractor". And Donohue should be ashamed of himself. But while other past situations never came to light, at least here the reletives and attorney's had the guts to complain!
Under the religious incorporation laws of the State of New York, a parish is a non profit corporation with a five man board of trustees: President - the Cardinal Archbisop of New York; Vice President - the Vicar General of the Archdiocese; Secretary - the pastor; and two lay trustees nominated by the pastor and approved by the Archbishop. In practise, the secretary of the corporation - the pastor - acts in locus of the Archbishop to operate the worldly corporate/fiscal afairs of the parish
So, while Woolsey may by guilty of malfeasance (along with other crimnal charges), Egan may be guilty of criminal negligence as well as misfeasance.
If these charges can be brought to bear in court, Egan may well be toast!
Independant contractors indeed!!!!!


35 posted on 07/14/2004 4:24:17 PM PDT by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding; Incorrigible; NYCVirago; eastsider; M007; HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; ...
Here is an update:
Father Flim Flam's out
Hits the bricks over missing mil
A Manhattan priest accused of bilking his parish and a wealthy spinster stepped down yesterday - slinking away from his rectory at dawn.

Msgr. John Woolsey, the charismatic pastor of Manhattan's St. John the Martyr Church, relinquished the day-to-day operations of the parish, church officials said.

The Archdiocese of New York asked Woolsey to give up his post after an audit revealed about $1 million went missing during Woolsey's eight-year tenure.

The Manhattan district attorney is probing whether the priest spent the money on a lavish lifestyle.

Several parishioners said yesterday that Woolsey blurred the line between donations earmarked for the church and gifts from his doting flock.

The handsome priest had an account at upscale Brooks Brothers and shopped at Bloomingdale's and Ralph Lauren, followers said. He had long lunches at posh restaurants and vacationed in Italy, Ireland and Spain. He golfed at upscale country clubs and only recently traded in his Lexus for a Honda.

Wealthy patrons picked up the tab for some of the trips and memberships, like the $5,000 initiation fee to join the posh Metropolitan Club along with its annual $2,000 dues. When his patron died, the membership was discontinued, sources said.

The scandal erupted after the estate of an elderly parishioner sued Woolsey, claiming he swindled the 88-year-old Rose Cale out of nearly $500,000 and pocketed some of the $241,500 she gave to the church.

Woolsey denies the charges.

But by Woolsey's own admission, Cale gave him $100,000 toward a retirement condo and another $63,000 to furnish it. She also opened a $70,000 joint stock account, which Woolsey got on her death.

"We believe he's accounted for everything and made no improper use of parish funds," Woolsey's lawyer, Nicholas DeFeis, said.

As of yesterday, the parish had $156,000 in a savings-money market account and $1,657 in a checking account, sources familiar with the investigation said.

A source familiar with the church's operations said it took in more than $5,000 a week in collections, which would mean a yearly take of at least $260,000.

Woolsey's defense includes sworn statements from wealthy followers who said they were satisfied with how the priest handled their hefty donations, DeFeis said.

What irked parishioner Joseph Salerno was that while Woolsey was living well he was nickel-and-diming the parish's homeless program by turning a sit down meal into a box lunch. The change saved the church about $250 a week, but seemed harsh, Salerno said.

"He wanted the program to be a pickup lunch and go. He didn't want to alienate the other parishioners, who frowned upon the homeless," said Salerno, a longtime volunteer for the program.

 

Father Flim Flam a target
DA to probe 500G 'gift'
Prosecutors have opened an investigation into the East Side priest accused in a lawsuit of sweet-talking a wealthy spinster out of nearly $500,000.

"We are looking into it," Sherry Hunter, a spokeswoman for Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, said yesterday.

A suit filed this week charges Msgr. John Woolsey, 66, with abusing his influence over the late Rose Cale to line his pockets - and buy a Jersey Shore condo - with her cash.

Woolsey had no comment, and one source at St. John the Martyr said the pastor was advised to see a doctor about a heart condition after the news broke.

But the big-bucks scandal swirling around Woolsey was the talk of the parish yesterday, in the pews and from the pulpit.

"Our concern should be, first of all, to pray for monsignor and everyone involved," the Rev. Joseph Baker told worshipers at afternoon Mass.

Outside, the flock was divided.

"I wish I could shout through a megaphone," said Maria Rhodes, 50, who went to the rectory to see Woolsey yesterday after her father died.

"I would proclaim that he's a great priest, a compassionate soul, an extraordinarily decent man. I would stake my life on this man's reputation."

Others were rattled by the lawsuit. "I won't lose my faith but I might lose trust in this church," said Lourdes Tajiri, 66, a St. John's parishioner for more than 40 years.

"I have no children and I was considering giving my estate to this church when I died," Tajiri added. "I'll be reconsidering that now. This has totally shocked me."

The lawsuit, filed by the executor of Cale's estate, claims Woolsey "induced" the trusting octogenarian to give him $490,000 in cash and stocks over three years.

He's accused of using $100,000 to buy a condominium in Monmouth Beach, N.J., in 1999 - a swank property he resold for $276,000 a few months ago, records show.

The lawsuit also names the Archdiocese of New York, which said only that it is "looking into" the allegations.

The Catholic League, however, rushed to Woolsey's defense, mocking the idea that the priest - who once ran the archdiocese's Family Life office - is a conniving hornswoggler.

"It is one thing if a clergyman shakes down a member of his flock, quite another if he takes a gift that has been voluntarily given to him," said Catholic League President William Donohue, a friend of Woolsey.

A St. John's source described Cale as a cantankerous but kind and generous woman who enjoyed a "father-daughter" relationship with Woolsey.

"I once jokingly made a comment asking for $100,000 for repairs to the organ and said if anyone had a check, I'd like to hear from them. She was outside my door immediately, saying, 'Don't take it from anyone else,'" the source said.

"I think [Woolsey] has been imprudent, maybe even stupid, but there is no reason why he could not accept gifts."

and in a previous case

New York Daily News - Home - Priest had loot, Nazi stash, porn

58 posted on 07/17/2004 9:45:33 PM PDT by Coleus (Abraham Lincoln was a trial lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Thanks for the links, Coleus.

I have said on here before that when the extent of the financial scandals in the Church come to light, they will make the pedophile priest scandals look like a Sunday School picnic.


86 posted on 10/05/2006 6:03:48 PM PDT by Palladin (Log Cabin Republicans have wooden heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson