Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Bonforte
" They gain nothing by delay, and nukes don't have an indefinite shelf life."

Maybe that's the cause of the delay. They had to figure out how to 'refresh?' them.

35 posted on 07/13/2004 7:33:59 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: blam; All
" They gain nothing by delay, and nukes don't have an indefinite shelf life."

That USED to be true with the old Polonium [?] based "Initiators" in the Nagasaki and Trinity devices.

It has been a long time since I studied Nuclear Engineering [our college had three research Reactors, including a CRITICAL, Heavy Water moderated one].

Some years ago, the ESONOMIST had a review of the way modern Nukes are initiated, and if I remember correctly, a Vaccuum Tube is fired up to supply the stream of Neutrons to accompany the Implosion.

I have no clue as to just what the Physics of a Vaccuum Tube supplied Neutron initiator involves, but it would seem to increase the storage life immensely.

In contrast, the Half Life of Polonium is 138.38 DAYS, so these "initiators"...if indeed used Polonium...would put Time as a critical factor.

No, unfortunately, the Nuke threat IS VERY REAL!!!

As to speculation about the design of the Original "Initiators", see "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Reeves.

The Hiroshima Weapon required NO initiator...just several Critical Masses of 90% U235...and Explosive Assembly.

107 posted on 07/13/2004 10:14:29 PM PDT by Lael (Patent Law...not a single Supreme Court Justice is qualified to take the PTO Bar Exam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson