Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl
BTW, I'm not trying to make anybody irate, it's just that the correct course of action has been so bloody obvious while too often what I have seen here has been impotent fecklessness.

I wonder how many FReepers voted for Prop 58?

41 posted on 07/14/2004 3:01:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

I voted against both of them. I wanted a real spending cap, modeled after Colorado's TABOR. We badly need to place one on the ballot.


42 posted on 07/14/2004 3:06:37 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

>>I wonder how many FReepers voted for Prop 58?

Too Many!

If truth in advertising applied to the California Recovery Team, they wouldn't have been able to so grossy misrepresent both Prop 57 and Prop 58. Phrases like "spending cap", "cut up the credit cards", "never again", "required to avoid bankruptcy", etc. would never have been used. Without the distortions and scare tactics, it would have failed... and the state would be better off. Now, we're right where we were, but instead of the existing debt at the time (about $7 billion), we're stuck with a $15 billion bond.... and still borrowing! Grrrrr... YOU don't mean to make me irate... the actions make me irate. /rant off


43 posted on 07/14/2004 3:30:03 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson