My photos of GWs visit in Marquette

my ^ | crz

[crz]

My photos of the rally.

[crz]

Not real good folks but I took the digi camera instead of my 35mm with the tele lense so I could get them up on here for you faster. Number 3,4, and 5 could be joined for a panarama. The last one is the actuall photo without it zoomed. If any of you can zoom the first pics and post them, please do so. I aint so good at this as you all are.

[crz]

Click on "my" above.

[crz]

Loads slow....And the photos dont really do justice to how big and how many were there. At least 13 thousand I feel.

[cripplecreek]

Those are good pictures. They show a pretty large crowd minus the liberal camera trick of making a crowd larger by getting select shots of the crowd.

[crz]

Thats exactly what I was trying to do. Thank you!

[TheBattman]

Zooming not too practical...pictures, although fairly large in display size, are too low of a resolution (dpi) to zoom...see below:

[crz]

The problem here is I havent a large pixel camera.

[ChadGore]

Re: If any of you can zoom the first pics and post them

I'm d/ling them now. I'll rescale them, mirror them, and post them back to the forum. OMG! WHAT A HUUUGE CROWD ! AND SUCH HI-RESOLUTION . .. it feels like you're right there! Wow !

We look forward to your comments.

How was it ? How many people ?

[crz]

I feel over 13 thousand were there. The stands hold 8 thousand and the only seat not taken were the vision blocked seats-about 500. The center part where all those people are is an area about 50 by 55 yards. Its a football statium..plain and simple, as they play college div 2 and high school football there as well as track and things like that.

[PA Lurker]

We all appreciate your effort. The the shots were very impressive and these overall shots are never shown by the liberal media. Thanks for sharing your experience.

[Paleo Conservative]

The problem here is I havent a large pixel camera.

The problem is you do have a large pixel camera. A camera with more pixels would display each pixel smaller.

[mombonn]

GREAT PICS, crz! WOW, to draw that kind of crowd in the UP is amazing!

[crz]

I guess thats what I meant. The more pixels the better the image. Its an old camera. But what the hay..

[cripplecreek]

Im not exactly computer literate either. I have a 3.3 mega pixel Vivitar and get some pretty good pics. I have some here at worldisround.com

http://www.worldisround.com/articles/54892/

[Paleo Conservative]

Those are good pictures. They show a pretty large crowd minus the liberal camera trick of making a crowd larger by getting select shots of the crowd.

Very true! The alphabet networks and "mainstream" "newspapers" will make very technically good photos that lie and distort the context.

[crz]

Those are some very nice photos creek. Cant beat a digi camera for close up shots. IMO.

[hoosiermama]

Thanks so much for the pictures.....Tell us about your day...Did "W" energize the crowd? What do you remember of the speech?

[ChadGore]

Mirrored, scaled, and reposted for your exclusive viewing pleasure.

http://users.wi.net/~johnh/AUT_8817_Small.JPG

---

http://users.wi.net/~johnh/AUT_8825_Small.JPG

---

http://users.wi.net/~johnh/AUT_8827_Small.JPG

---

http://users.wi.net/~johnh/AUT_8843_Small.JPG

---

http://users.wi.net/~johnh/AUT_8844_Small.JPG

---

http://users.wi.net/~johnh/AUT_8845_Small.JPG

[VOA]

Not real good folks but I took the digi camera instead of my 35mm with the tele lense

To the contrary...those are pretty good photos and do a good job of capturing
the size of the gathering.
We can get close-up zoon-lens shots of Dubya from professional photographers any day
(that play down the size of the crowd!).

[My2Cents]

Actually, looks like a good crowd.