Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HipShot
There is not the risk of breakage that exists with windows patches.

Developers introduce unintentional and/or incidental regressions (aka bugs that break previously working functionality) all the time. Consequently, a decision to patch isn't based merely upon whether the patch is available and whether it can be installed with other components. Regression of functionality has to be a major consideration.
35 posted on 07/14/2004 12:17:48 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Bush2000

That's specific to your situation, and should be treated as such each and every time.

I got caught twice on a mail server with updates that broke functionality. In one case, a clamav update required a larger allocation of resources for threading, but it wasn't mentioned. As clamav didn't return an error code to qmail-scanner, all mail was delivered, infected or not.

On the other occasion, the perl suid "fix" required a minor change to my inbound and outbound qmail-scanner scripts, which actually delayed mail for awhile.

Patches can be a nightmare, but even so I'd much rather deal with undocumented issues than expose my doze users.


38 posted on 07/14/2004 12:25:35 PM PDT by HipShot (All of our ammunition should be dipped in pig fat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson