[tacticalogic]

I know it's not relevant in this case but still true.

So what is it about the court's decision in this case that has you, and the author of this article so worked up? That they made the right decision, but for the wrong reasons?

[Tailgunner Joe]

We have been addressing many issues, not all of which are relevant to this case.

For example, I said I would ban all porn outright, but this case is only about the internet.

I agree with Scalia's dissent. Porn is not speech and is not protected by the first amendment.