To: Tailgunner Joe
I do agree the U.S Supreme Court's reasoning about free speech is all bollixed. I mean political speech can be subject to legal restrictions but pornography gets the highest level of judicial protection. I defy a single person on this forum or in the country to tell me that makes for sound jurisprudence in the First Amendment area.
244 posted on
07/13/2004 1:35:37 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
A voice of reason. What will the response be?
245 posted on
07/13/2004 1:40:48 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
("You're possibly the most ignorant, belligerent, and loathesome poster on FR currently." - tdadams)
To: goldstategop
I defy a single person on this forum or in the country to tell me that makes for sound jurisprudence in the First Amendment area. SCOTUS's decision on CFR is one of the worst calls on their part in the last 50 or so years.
That being said, how would SCOTUS allowing the banning of pornography in any way make the CFR decision easier to swallow?
249 posted on
07/13/2004 1:44:22 PM PDT by
Modernman
("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson