Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ServesURight

Right. So even if the kids don't see the porn (and since most teenagers who have computers are better techies than their parents, of course any porn filters will be rendered null and void by them) the neighborhood sickos can be filled to the brim with porn and be ready to put their sick fantasies into action on the neighborhood kids.

There is no justification in the Constitution or anywhere else to protect pornography. There is no inalienable right to watch explicit and especially weird, violent, or child sex. If you want sex, go do your own.


125 posted on 07/13/2004 11:30:45 AM PDT by little jeremiah ("You're possibly the most ignorant, belligerent, and loathesome poster on FR currently." - tdadams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
the neighborhood sickos can be filled to the brim with porn and be ready to put their sick fantasies into action on the neighborhood kids.

So long as they don't act out their sick fantasies on anyone other than consenting adults, what business is it of yours?

There is no justification in the Constitution or anywhere else to protect pornography.

Our courts disagree.

133 posted on 07/13/2004 11:33:04 AM PDT by Modernman ("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson