That's completely unacceptable and immoral, as it is discrimination against taxpaying gay citizens.
That's completely unacceptable and immoral, as it is discrimination against taxpaying gay citizens.
No it's not. They are free to get married to a member of the opposite sex and enjoy all the benefits of marriage they want.
The 'discrimination' angle is a sham. Society shouldn't have to fund sexual hobbyists who are incapable of upholding their end of the marriage bargain.
We also discriminate against 10 year olds getting married, even with the consent of their taxpaying parents. It's discrimination based on age, and it may be a slippery slope, but I don't lose any sleep over it.
If this is the basis for the liberal / libertarian arguement, then we need an Amendment to settle this.