To: PreviouslyA-Lurker
And if you don't think writing discrimination into the constitution ISN'T going to cause a problem for this country, then you're wrong.
121 posted on
07/13/2004 9:59:10 AM PDT by
Jayhuck
(age)
To: Jayhuck
Confirming marriage to be what it has always been is not discrimination.
Changing the definition of marriage to suit a few involved in perversion is foolishness and will cause the fall of a society and culture. Look at ancient Greece.
127 posted on
07/13/2004 10:06:01 AM PDT by
PreviouslyA-Lurker
(al-Qa'ida terrorists are cowards who hide behind masks and decapitate helpless victims.)
To: Jayhuck
And if you don't think writing discrimination into the constitution ISN'T going to cause a problem for this country, then you're wrong.
Who would be discriminated against, and how?
Also, in regards to discrimination, the 26th Amendment discriminates against people under 18 years of age. Discrimination isn't necessarily a bad thing.
To: Jayhuck
And if you don't think writing discrimination into the constitution . . .Do your lies never end?
242 posted on
07/13/2004 2:53:19 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Soros: a left-wing billionaire currency speculator who funds many liberal efforts)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson