Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Unfortunately, the Court used Marbury vs. Madison to seize this power and nobody (except Andrew Jackson) ever attempted to stop them.

That opinion tells you where the 'scholars' find that "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." There are several arguments in there.

9 posted on 07/12/2004 8:25:48 PM PDT by FreeBSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FreeBSD
There are also several counterarguments to those arguments. I'd have to dust off my con law notes, but Marbury was a very badly crafted and decided case. After all, the Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction. the rest is dicta and shouldn't have even been included.
11 posted on 07/12/2004 8:34:34 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson