Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Look, we have the entire Republican Senate pushing for a constitutional ammendment and we have a President endorsing it and being very pro-life.

Let's let the party try to appeal at least a little to the moderates at the convention (aka: show).


5 posted on 07/12/2004 6:18:12 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gilliam

I agree, but remember how Dole seemed to abandon the base and what happened.


10 posted on 07/12/2004 6:21:31 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gilliam

Words vs. deeds.
I was going to type the same thing.
I'd rather have the work than the pretty talk.

He's definately making inroads into the black churches - this is why the venom from the NAACP just popped to nuclear proportions.


11 posted on 07/12/2004 6:21:56 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gilliam
"Let's let the party try to appeal at least a little to the moderates at the convention (aka: show)."

So have Guiliani and Arnold, but Pataki? Why not let at least one conservative on stage such as Bennett or Kemp? Are we supposed to go into stealth mode because we are ashamed of our positions? or because we think we can somehow trick people into voting for us?

25 posted on 07/12/2004 6:30:18 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gilliam
Look, we have the entire Republican Senate pushing for a constitutional ammendment and we have a President endorsing it and being very pro-life.

And the media doesn't let their message go out unfiltered. The convention would be an opportunity to get the message out, without Dan or Tom or Peter cutting and editing. Unfortunately, the GOP bigwigs don't have the courage of the party's supposed convictions.

186 posted on 07/13/2004 9:06:46 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: gilliam
Let's let the party try to appeal at least a little to the moderates at the convention (aka: show).

So I guess you are saying that the squish-Moderate windsocks are guillible, and won't see this for what it is...right? They won't know what hit them?

Or is it that when there are enough squish-Moderate windsocks who join, the Conservatives will be dumped? They won't know what hit them?

Either way, the subterfuge only plays one group as a sucker...which one is it I wonder?

189 posted on 07/13/2004 10:12:03 AM PDT by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson