Posted on 07/12/2004 6:12:22 PM PDT by wagglebee
Social conservatives feel they are getting short shrift from the Republican National Committee’s lineup of speakers at the GOP convention in New York this year, reports the New York Times.
Thus far, prime time speaking slots are nearly bereft of those who share the views of the party's conservative majority - a vital voting bloc the Bush campaign desperately needs if it is to win in November.
Still, the Times writes:
Even though Karl Rove "emphasized the importance of turning out conservative churchgoers" who didn't vote in the numbers he expected in 2000, and even though they are a "major target of [GOP] voter registration efforts," it doesn't seem they will be well represented in prime time at the convention in NY.
The Rev. Donald E. Wildmon, founder of the American Family Association, told the Times the "Bush campaign had made mistakes, including its outreach to churches and the omission of more social conservatives from the convention so far. 'They have alienated people who they desperately need, big time,' he said."
The Bush/Cheney campaign has miffed some churchgoers with certain voter-registration tactics, including having congregations send the campaign their registries.
Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the conservative Southern Baptist Convention, told the Times: "I'm appalled that the Bush-Cheney campaign would intrude on a local congregation in this way."
President Bush is the only visible national conservative who has "turned up his own talk of opposition to abortion and especially same-sex marriage," which is up for debate in the Senate this week.
Moderates like McCain, Giuliani, Pataki, and Schwarzenegger will all speak in prime time at the GOP confab, but no true social conservative other than President Bush will garner precious, limited network airtime.
The most like-minded person with a featured speaking role is Senator Zell Miller, a Democrat from Georgia.
He drew fire from National Review's Washington editor Kate O'Beirne, who wrote, "When the only Reagan Republican to enjoy a prominent supporting role at the party's convention is a Democrat, the GOP has a serious identity problem."
The roster of speakers, she added, "is not the mark of a self-confident party establishment."
More ominous was the warning from long time conservative activist Paul Weyrich: "I hate to say it, but... If the president is embarrassed to be seen with conservatives at the convention, maybe conservatives will be embarrassed to be seen with the president on Election Day."
More conciliatory was Gary Bauer, a social conservative candidate who sought the Republican presidential nomination in 2000.
Noting the Bush backs the Constitutional amendment defining marriage as being solely between a man and woman, now being debated in the Senate, Bauer, the founder of the American Values organization, added. "We had been assured months ago that as this vote happened the president would take an active role - both publicly and on Capitol Hill. So they are keeping their word and my hat goes off to them for that."
But he told the Times, "If they are going to win the values debate - and it looks like there is going to be one - it is important for the president's words to be reinforced by other major personalities at the convention."
He added that his fellow social conservatives continue to push for greater representation at the convention, and said that the President should address abortion, same-sex marriage and similar issues prominently when he speaks to the convention.
Answering conservative critics, Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt told the Times Sunday: "The Republican Party is a national party, and the convention lineup will reflect the broad national appeal of the Republican Party. When the speaker lineup is complete, it will reflect that."
Ick.
He's da mayor.
The strategy is to attract some liberal votes while dumping social conservatives. It worked for Weld in Massachusetts!
I use to be a drunken sailor. One the happiest times in my life, but I didn't have other peoples money to spend.
Can you please name all the Republican Administrations in the past century that were more socially conservative than our current one?
That's pure baloney. Political conventions don't sway voters. Political conventions are meant for loyal party activists to gather together and nominate their choice to run for POTUS. It's a big rally designed to call to action the party faithful and come together to renew an effort by joining in a common cause.
The Republican National Convention delegates are mostly made up of conservatives. Just like the Democratic National Convention will be made up of mostly liberals.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAA.
Never seen any bump in the polls after a convention, have you?
The "base" is as inconsequential today, as it was then. /sarcasm
The GOP never knows when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em.
I don't want to misrepresent myself. It was a sail boat. Not military.
Good heavens... not this garbage again... still...
Duh. And just who is watching the conventions. I'll tell ya. NOBODY! Its a one big infomercial with the media coverage driving what is broadcast on TV and what is revealed in the written word, ie.mags,rags & internet websites. For a few days people are subjected to overwhelming accounts from the conventions. Bottomline. Convention bumps don't mean much. What happens in the two months after the conventions does matter.
I like Zel, as well. I think he's very appropriate. Arnold, I don't know. I'd rather hear Michael Reagan, as I wrote in the other thread.
I'm curious, do you feel . . embarrassed . . by the President's view against permissive abortion, against so-called 'gay marriage'? Do you think he is embarrassed?
Maybe Rove is all wet on this. Maybe he should stop fretting, and stop whining, and get serious. The Party stands squarely against the Dem and their refusal to let through Bush court appointees, particularly on the issue of permissive abortion. Say that proudly - in prime time!
You have a problem with that?
They don't know how good they've got it, but it's apparently never enough.
"but no true social conservative other than President Bush will garner precious, limited network airtime."
Uh, Dick Cheney.
Going to be big fun for them, right? Maybe they can get Prescott 'Reagan' to come over after he's thought about his remarks at the Dem convention.
And as well, if you have Zel, who I like btw, why not Joe Lieberman, too? That way, you could keep Cheney off the platform. What do you think of Dick Cheney?
Sounds like Rove has got a real fun-time planned. And these conventions only come around once every four years. They'll have to wait another four to get it right.
And then you say to me - wait a minute, we'll see.
I'm sure the delegates will be warned in advance about standing up and cheering for liberal speakers like GovRino. It's Rudi`s city, I don't mind him. In fact, if they had some conservatives speaking in prime time, other then Bush and Cheney, I wouldn't mind the occasional centrist Republican voice. Liberals?... can stay home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.