Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
A terrible idea, why should Alaska have a say in what happens to their trees, they're my trees too.

IMO, it's then a state forest, not a national forest. Give the whole thing to the state if they are going to run it, and let them pay to maintain it. Why should an out of state taxpayer pay for a forest they have no stake in?

6 posted on 07/12/2004 5:39:28 PM PDT by Huck (I love the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
Why should an out of state taxpayer pay for a forest they have no stake in?

Well, you get to visit. But why sould anyone pay for a forest, they're at best income generators, otherwise, well, leave them alone.

8 posted on 07/12/2004 5:44:29 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Rereading your comment, A terrible idea, why should Alaska have a say in what happens to their trees, they're my trees too. , that was sarcasm, I forget to put in the /sarcasm thing.
19 posted on 07/12/2004 6:16:30 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson