But beyond hunting for missing kids, Nimrod Dobson is skewing the marriage debate with non-sequitors; in short, he don't make good sense. Example:
"The gospel of Jesus Christ will be severely curtailed." Now I think my particular religious denomination is better than everyone else's too, but that's not important here. There is NO (emphasis in the 'no' part) jurisdiction that allows homosexual marriage (ok, maybe Massachusetts but they're in a big hurry to fix that) and equates homosexual rumpypumpy to marriage. No Islamic country, Jewish country, Hindu country, Buddhist country, Atheist country, --this is not just a Christian issue.
/////////////////
a scandenavian pastor has already been thrown in the pokey for calling homosexuality an abomination--which is scripturally correct--and attested to by both the old and new testatments.
This was pointed out in the dobson post as well as canadian moves to make any talk against homosexuality a category of of hate speach--punishable by imprisonment.
But you knew that.
Clearly you are on the other side of the culture war.
Nice try.
Why, thank you (I thought it was pretty nice even if I do say so). But how are we not on the same side of the culture war? I approve of your views on religious censorship (against), on homosexual marriages (against) and Dobson being a Nimrod (in favor). What the hey, we agree on everything!
What's the problem?