>To call these people "economic conservatives"--with the implication that they favor abortion-on-demand, as RINO Johnny Isakson does--is a lie,
Was not implying they favor abortion but they do not tend to be people who are one issue voters or put the subject high on their checklist.I think any opinion researcher in the state would agree with me.
You do your case no justice by continuing to push the lie that Isakson is for abortion on demand.It removes any moral ground from your argument and puts you on the same level as the secular crowd.If it were true I am sure the Christian coalition would not give him the rating they do and the former Ga. president of the organization would not have endorsed him.
Johnny Isakson has always supported, and continues to support, keeping abortion legal.
Your favorite paper (Cynthia's rag, the AJC) recently said of your boy, "In his 1990 bid for governor, Isakson angered anti-abortion Republicans by declaring
that he would veto any legislation that restricted access to abortion. .." This was the whole point of the abortion-rights campaign for the Senate that Johnny ran (and lost) in 1996. You, sir, are the liar--like your boy. (And you know good and well that Johnny bought the endorsements he's gotten from the "Christians." You probably delivered the check yourself.)
Dear Blessed,
As we've discussed before, abortion is not merely a moral issue. As I demonstrated in an earlier thread, abortion has had and will continue to have destructive economic ramifications for our nation - an observation which YOU admitted to be a fact.
I must also add that your response to that observation was extremely weak, as you could only ask what legislation has been proposed or will be proposed that would alter that fact - the implication being that Mr. Isakson's pro-abortion stance doesn't matter since he hasn't had a chance to vote for any anti-abortion legislation (your implication, not mine).
You also did not deny that Mr. Isakson is pro-abortion. But now you do and accuse those of us who state the truth of lying. Shame on you for twisting the facts!
Let's get it straight one more time:
1. Abortion is ravagin our country economically as we have eliminated 43 million innocent children, which roughly equates to 22 million workers.
2. Mr. Isakson has a history of pro-abortion stances and votes.
Given those facts, why should any moral or economic conservative cast a vote for Mr. Isakson?
Furthermore, since you claim to be a Christian (or at least spout Bible verses to give the impression), why are you okay with a candidate who supports killing babies?
I know one thing, when I cast my vote for Cain, my conscience will not bother me. However, if you vote for Isakson, your conscience ought to bother you.