Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boner1
Ahhh but you don't understand. If one state allows it the others will be forced by the courts to recognize is too. Also, let's get our elected officials on record for what they stand for. Maybe it fails this time. However, might help in the ballot box to make sure it passes next time.
105 posted on 07/12/2004 11:23:24 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: reagandemo
From Section 2 of H.R. 3396, the Defense of Marriage Act:
"No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship."

As someone has pointed out on this thread already, no court has even considered ruling the DOMA unconstitutional, nor, in my opinion, will they.
151 posted on 07/12/2004 11:44:15 AM PDT by eiffel (pioneer of aerodynamics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson