Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoctorMichael; All

Um, the article doesn't do anything of the sort.

It seems this woman is saying that she's not surprised that 9/11 was Osama's doing, that he'd rather let his child die than violate some stupid interpretation of a Quranic verse and that he didn't embrace fundamentalism because he failed with Western women, but because he was devout from nearly jump.

Not sure about you, but that makes him even worse. It always seemed a bit silly to attribute his fanaticism to his failure to bed Western women or shyness. Instead, maybe he simply believes as he believes and that's why he's Osama.

Nothing touchy-feely about that.


25 posted on 07/11/2004 2:42:07 PM PDT by Skywalk (Transdimensional Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Skywalk
Um, the article doesn't do anything of the sort.

"........the baby's suffering was less important than a principle........."

A man of 'principle'. How nice.

I rest my case.

26 posted on 07/11/2004 2:45:18 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson