Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
We could have stopped Iraq from doing anything militarily with just our airpower. Anything even remotely deemed militarily offensive in nature could have been taken out at a moments notice. We could have eliminated Saddam and his two boys without putting one single soldier on the ground in Iraq.

How did our airpower stop Saddam from operating his two terrorist training camps (ie Salman Pak)?

Are you suggesting it couldn't have?

I>How did our airpower stop his violations of UN sanctions, his aquisition of banned missiles from RPNK, bio-weapons labs, etc.?

Are you kidding? Again airpower could have takin any missiles or labs out. If we wanted to, I'd would have been a piece of cake.

bottom line: Just as airpower doesnt win wars alone, it cant stop terrorist sponsorship and rogue nation's activities by itself.

Your bottom line is wrong.

Airpower could have taken out *anything* deemed militarily offensive on the ground routinely, on short notice. *Including* his capacity to produce oil for offensive purposes. Piece of cake. We've done it in other wars and it worked very well.

217 posted on 07/11/2004 4:53:42 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Hadenuf

But how would we have taken out Saddam's WMD program in Libya when we didn't even know about it? It IS because we went into Iraq that led to that knowledge.


218 posted on 07/11/2004 4:58:56 PM PDT by Chgogal ("Treat us mean, keep us clean, all we want is to cook and clean." I've got a bridge to sell ya all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Joe, actually my bottom line is right.

Saddam had bunkers and in any case we didnt know if and *where* to bomb. Those two terror camps I mentioned? One was salman pak. The other one - WE DISCOVERED ONLY AFTER WE INVADED IRAQ. It's trivial. We bomb one camp, they move it somewhere else and camaflauge it.

If bombing terror camps was enough to stop terrorism, we never would have had 9/11 (since we bombed bin laden in 1998 dontcha know).


221 posted on 07/11/2004 5:08:46 PM PDT by WOSG (Peace through Victory! Iraq victory, W victory, American victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Airpower could have taken out *anything* deemed militarily offensive on the ground routinely, on short notice. *Including* his capacity to produce oil for offensive purposes. Piece of cake. We've done it in other wars and it worked very well.

Then how do you explain the missiles that hit Kuwait? Or the ones we found after the invasion? Air Power is not the be-all end-all. Even the USAF is begining to realize that since Operation Allied Force (Balkans) and the hunt for UBL. You have to identify targets before you can bomb them. That's pretty tough to do in many circumstances for instance when you're after terrorists intermingled with the populace.

225 posted on 07/11/2004 5:21:13 PM PDT by No Longer Free State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson