To: sinkspur
Re: "That information is bad" (world court)
I hope you are right. Michael Savage reported it last week that the Bush administration has flipped on the world court position. Savage is not my fav, so I am hoping you are right. But it is the latest I have heard on the subject so I have nothing to disprove him (Savage).
To: Mark in the Old South
Bush didn't "flip." The Bush administration said it would not seek another year's exemption for US troops, since it couldn't win the exemption in the UN.
In return, the State Department said it would be more reluctant to get involved in peace-keeping missions, since our troops could be accused of war crimes.
153 posted on
07/11/2004 2:55:03 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
To: Mark in the Old South
I hope you are right. Michael Savage reported it last week that the Bush administration has flipped on the world court position. Whew if you beleive what Michael Wiener(Savage) says, you seem like a good person to sell the Brooklyn Bridge to. Interested in buying it?
179 posted on
07/11/2004 3:30:45 PM PDT by
Dane
To: Mark in the Old South
I hope you are right. Michael Savage reported it last week that the Bush administration has flipped on the world court position. Perhaps you're the one who needs to do a little more reading.
That Savage report was totally trashed right here on this forum within minutes of him making that statement.
It's a LIE. You're not bothering to check out the facts just proves where you're coming from.
279 posted on
07/12/2004 6:36:55 AM PDT by
Howlin
(John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson