Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Revel

I would nuke my top 2 enemies, and sort out the damage later on.

That would be iran and n. korea, imho

It's not like after we've got 20 of our cities in flames, that anyone's going to CARE about world opinion.


1,974 posted on 07/14/2004 9:36:08 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1973 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

But then would Russia and China say...Here is our justification(to do what they want to do anyways) and then start sending the missles.


1,978 posted on 07/14/2004 9:39:58 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1974 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

You forgot France.


1,979 posted on 07/14/2004 9:40:06 AM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1974 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The way I see it...The big threat countries have not been a real problem because of the threat of mutual self destruct. But when you have people runing down main street carring WMD and you don't even know who to blame if one is used...because there are so many people it could be...From a strategic point of veiw...Mutual self destruction becomes a bit meaningless.
We either knock of the PC stuff and secure our country from within of else we are going to suffer the consequences of our enemies. We made it quite easy for them by giving up our nationalism.


1,990 posted on 07/14/2004 9:47:36 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1974 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson