Posted on 07/10/2004 12:31:31 PM PDT by wagglebee
Homosexual Agenda Ping. I just can't get out of here! More and more crap coming down the chute. Remember the Tsunami of Sludge? Comin' atcha!
Sooo, two men or two women claiming a "relationship" - IOW, they live together and practice mutual sodomy - get rewarded. How special.
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
I noticed one comment - what about two BROTHERS? Why the he!! not? I hope bunches of brothers, and sisters, start applying. Or mothers and daughters, fathers and sons. Or just two regular "normal" room mates.
Pretty soon there will be no sexually normal people working for universities. I guess that's part of the plan.
the point of homoadvocates is to imply all same sex cohabitation is secretly homosexual in nature.
The want to make all heterosexual conduct penalized or not rewarded while homosexual conduct is rewarded.
Even if this means normal people just living together will claim homosexuality to gain financial benefit.
Don't forget the FMA vote is comming this week.
Kerry/edwards say they are going to vote against it because "it should be left to the states". They conveniently ignore the FACT that passing in the senate DOES MOVE THIS ISSUE TO THE STATES.
The media is conveniently skipping that fact too.
Oh, yes - just find a roommate who has a serious ailment, and you can probably charge premium rent.
Exactly, now please explain to me how private businesses are supposed to support this?
this begs for the flashback of the homosexual group which had to cut health insurance for recreational live in sex partners due to costs. (posted here on FR months back)
While some warn that this "is a trap" designed to get Americans to accept same sex roommate benefits, I still contend that there is no legal basis for such payouts.
In the absence of a marriage, ALL roommates should be elligible if this policy is to stand. There should not be an imposition of a "sexual relationship" (whether heterosexual or homosexual) to qualify the roommate for health care. And that should extend to family members (parents, siblings, cousins, aunts, uncles, etc.) who live with the employee.
Lawsuit! Lawsuit!
Same crime, same time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.