Replies

THE GOLDEN BASIC LAW

The Basic Law assumes, although it does not state it explicitly, that human beings fall into four basic categories:
the helpless,
the intelligent,
the bandit,
and the stupid.

If Tom takes an action and suffers a loss while producing a gain to Dick, Tom acted helplessly.

If Tom takes an
action by which he makes a gain while yielding a gain also to Dick, Tom acted intelligently.

If Tom takes an action by which he makes a gain causing Dick a loss, Tom acted as a bandit.

As the Golden Basic Law explicitly clarifies:

---- A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses. ----

When confronted for the first time with the Basic Law, rational people instinctively react with feelings of skepticism and incredulity.
The fact is that reasonable people have difficulty in conceiving and understanding unreasonable behavior.

But let us abandon the lofty plane of theory and let us look pragmatically at our daily life.

We all recollect occasions in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his gain and our loss:
we had to deal with a bandit.

We also recollect cases in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his loss and our gain:
we had to deal with a helpless person.

We can recollect cases in which a fellow took an action by which both parties gained:
he was intelligent.

Such cases do indeed occur. But upon thoughtful reflection you must admit that these are not the events which punctuate most frequently our daily life.

Our daily life is mostly, made of cases in which we lose money and/or time and/or energy and/or appetite, cheerfulness and good health because of the improbable action of some preposterous creature who has nothing to gain and indeed gains nothing from causing us embarrassment, difficulties or harm.
Nobody knows, understands or can possibly explain why that preposterous creature does what he does.

In fact there is no explanation - or better there is only one explanation:
the person in question is stupid.
______________________________________

I took the liberty of cleaning up the authors main premise a bit..
Great article.. Thanks.

New tag line bump.

I haven't a clue, after reading the article and your reply, about what you are talking about? Is it flinty eyed Yankee oppressors stealing the food from the aged and unwashed, or is it socialists not suppling the necessities to the aged and unwashed?