[savedbygrace]

A connection, yes, but what Dims and Libs look for is a connection with probable cause. They can tout the line that President Bush was influenced by Lay, because of donations and Lay's presence in those meetings.

What is mentioned in this thread doesn't fall into that category. So Lay and Heinz were on the same board. Where's the beef?

There might be beef, but it isn't here yet. Until then, you're chasing your tail on this one.

IMO.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Er, uh, Clinton was ENTIRELY bought off by Enron donations/bribes; and explicitly made foreign policy and US political pressure and US energy dept proposals on behalf of Enron to Indonesia, China, and India.

It was, in fact, the economic failure of these Ponzi schemes (under Bush, when he refused to go along with Enron's promotions) that led to Enron's failures.