Skip to comments.
GLOBAL TEAM OF PHYSICISTS UPENDS STANDARD MODEL WITH DISCOVERY OF NEUTRINO OSCILLATION, MASS
Boston University ^
| 08 July 2004
| News release staff
Posted on 07/09/2004 12:20:53 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
This is unlikely to be a long thread, but anything that affects the Standard Model is probably important.
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Science list Ping! This is an elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
2
posted on
07/09/2004 12:22:01 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: PatrickHenry
I skimmed the headline, saw the "Bostob" dateline, and saw the "Super-K" term in the article, and figured it was a "Physicists for Kerry" press release..
3
posted on
07/09/2004 12:23:09 PM PDT
by
ken5050
(We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
To: PatrickHenry
Neutrinos have mass?
I'm burning my books.
4
posted on
07/09/2004 12:24:02 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: PatrickHenry
These findings show that the Standard Model needs to be modified To the Deluxe Model?
5
posted on
07/09/2004 12:25:19 PM PDT
by
talleyman
(E=mc2 (before taxes))
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: PatrickHenry
If the neutrino has mass, that would explain why 2/3 seem to be missing in some of the experiments. (I'll go give "Herr Auge" a pat on the way out today.)
7
posted on
07/09/2004 12:26:14 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: PatrickHenry
I have been telling these people this for years!
Tau-Neutrino BUMP!
8
posted on
07/09/2004 12:27:35 PM PDT
by
mattdono
(To President Reagan: Rest now. Look in on us. Enjoy eternity. I'll see you again some day.)
To: PatrickHenry
Good. I always thought it was bogus. Too complicated; the truth has to be simple. I'm betting within our lifetimes electromagnetism will be shown to be the same thing as gravity.
9
posted on
07/09/2004 12:28:01 PM PDT
by
Flightdeck
(Procrastinate later)
To: GWTexan
"I've always believed neutrinos and even photons have some level of mass, if planck levels.. Probably means that even they don't truly travel at the speed of 'light', but just under the absolute."
Ok... and if photons have mass and don't travel at the speed of light, and a lightwave is comprised of photons, then light doesn't travel at the speed of light? :)
10
posted on
07/09/2004 12:31:32 PM PDT
by
brownsfan
(Build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, he'll be warm the rest of his life.)
To: PatrickHenry
Version 3.01 coming soon.
To: brownsfan
Re: Your tag line.
Give a man a fish and hell eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and hell sit in the boat all day drinking beer.
To: PatrickHenry
Strange things ar afoot at the Super-K.
13
posted on
07/09/2004 12:38:42 PM PDT
by
Big Giant Head
( < What stupid thing are we going to do today, Brain?>)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
The findings...give the most precise measurement yet of neutrino mass....In addition, the recent analysis finds that the location of the dip in the oscillatory pattern shows the mass difference between the neutrinos. It is the most precise measurement yet of that difference in mass....It would be nice if the press release writer could have put some number to these "precise" measurements. It is my understanding that prior work has set a very low value for any possible neutrino mass. Also, IIUC, any mass attributed to neutrinos cannot contribute appreciably to the "dark" matter deficit.
15
posted on
07/09/2004 12:41:27 PM PDT
by
Faraday
To: PatrickHenry; Physicist
Um, OK, but, then ... what is the mass of a neutrino?
16
posted on
07/09/2004 12:43:00 PM PDT
by
jennyp
(Edwards & Kerry: Liberal & Liberaler)
To: PatrickHenry
. This discovery shows that it is likely that the Standard Model, proposed in the 1970s to describe the fundamental forces and particles that make up all matter, is incomplete.HAH! Changing the goal posts again, EH evil scientists?!?! Did you ever stop to wonder, that maybe, just MAYBE, if you weren't such heathen sinning swine, that the real souce of all forces and particles would be obvious?!?!
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:0mJg5hLo2tEJ:www.wehug.com/three-turtles-redpoly-29791a.jpg)
ALL the way down, fools!
17
posted on
07/09/2004 12:43:55 PM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Faraday
It would be nice if the press release writer could have put some number to these "precise" measurements. It is my understanding that prior work has set a very low value for any possible neutrino mass. Also, IIUC, any mass attributed to neutrinos cannot contribute appreciably to the "dark" matter deficit. That omission bothers me too. I'd like to know the cosmological implications of neutrion mass.
18
posted on
07/09/2004 12:44:28 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: PatrickHenry
neutrion mass. Fumble. I meant neutrino mass.
19
posted on
07/09/2004 12:45:50 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: PatrickHenry
Big changes are coming. Yesterday it was that the galaxies near the beginning were already too mature for the time they had to evolve. What a great time to be an undergrad studying physics!
20
posted on
07/09/2004 12:48:19 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson