Skip to comments.
Does George W. Bush understand his Enemy?
07/09/2004
| NraFreedom
Posted on 07/09/2004 11:57:32 AM PDT by NraFreedom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: NraFreedom; Admin Moderator
"Is it possible that George W. Bush miscalculated the effects of our invasion? Are we paying the price for it now? Will we pay a higher price later?"
Anything is possible, but on the whole, I'd say no.
2
posted on
07/09/2004 12:02:15 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
To: NraFreedom
Do we need to understand how the Iranians and Syrians are looking at our removing an Islamic leader from the world stage? We KNOW how they look at it -- with horror (as they should).
They're next.
3
posted on
07/09/2004 12:03:18 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: NraFreedom
To: NraFreedom
Seven hundred years from now, they will be ruminating on the debacle caused by OBL, and nodding sagely about how it is best not to poke at a sleeping lion. At some point, you have to stop pussyfooting around with respect for other cultures and assert a little order via a swift butt kickin'. Now is the time. The US Military has the honor of being the boot.
5
posted on
07/09/2004 12:06:32 PM PDT
by
bondjamesbond
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: NraFreedom
Did your mom support abortion? Do you support abortion?
6
posted on
07/09/2004 12:07:36 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(I have no tagline. But I am the worse half of a $2/day monthly donor FReeper family.)
To: MeekOneGOP
7
posted on
07/09/2004 12:08:49 PM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(I have no tagline. But I am the worse half of a $2/day monthly donor FReeper family.)
To: NraFreedom
Curious post for a newbie -NraFreedom Since Jul 9, 2004
8
posted on
07/09/2004 12:09:18 PM PDT
by
zlala
To: NraFreedom
We didn't want Syria or Iran as "allies". They are the enemy. Why give the enemy experience, opportunity for infiltration, and influence? Perhaps it is the author who doesn't understand the context.
9
posted on
07/09/2004 12:10:20 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(End the imperialist moo slime colonization of the West!)
To: NraFreedom
Do we need to understand how the Iranians and Syrians are looking at our removing an Islamic leader from the world stage? Iran is ready for revolution, Bush has said he would support it. I think the students are now biding their time, waiting to see how Iraq fairs.
Syria is extremely nervous right now. They have a very weak leader who is easily influenced by both sides, and could be influenced by the central government of Iraq if it is strong enough.
10
posted on
07/09/2004 12:10:54 PM PDT
by
gilliam
To: NraFreedom
I've had to read your piece twice to figure out you hid your trolling in a BS historical analogy.
What part of the destruction of militant Islam don't you understand? We are going to go through with this policy come hell or high water.
11
posted on
07/09/2004 12:11:55 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(If Peace is Patriotic why are they ashamed to fly the Flag?)
To: zlala
Curious post for a newbie -NraFreedom Since Jul 9, 2004Infiltraitor?
12
posted on
07/09/2004 12:12:19 PM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: ServesURight
13
posted on
07/09/2004 12:13:16 PM PDT
by
NraFreedom
(Good Idea!)
To: NraFreedom
In his new book, The Secret History of the Iraq War, Yossef Bodansky, Director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, and Director of research at the International Strategic Studies Association, tacks a theme that the Bush Administration is not sensitive to the fact that the Islamic world does not look at the invasion of Iraq as just the removal of a dictator; rather they see it as an unprovoked attack on the Islam world; they see it as a virtual replay of the 13th century Mongolian attacks on Bagdad, the eventual sacking and ravaging of the area, and the eventual triumph of the Mulim Caliph! Another hand wringer. The Islamic world sees this invasion in just the way their rulers present it to them. And their rulers need an external enemy to focus their subjects' rage. The Islamic world is in for decades of turmoil. (Like it hasn't been already.) Their governments will be replaced because the US has discovered that allowing them to continue ruling is detrimental to our national security. Be thankful 9-11 didn't involve the detonation of an atomic weapon in the US. And pray we have acted soon enough to prevent it from happening in the future.
14
posted on
07/09/2004 12:13:45 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
To: NraFreedom
Yes, we must try to understand their rage so we can learn the reasons that they hate us so.
Right
uh huh
yep
just so
ay yah
indubitably.
15
posted on
07/09/2004 12:13:48 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: NraFreedom
I invite intellectual discussion ZOT! Viking Kitties, attack!
16
posted on
07/09/2004 12:13:55 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: NraFreedom
To: Conspiracy Guy
I like your reply. I am proud to have them be the boot too. But, do we need to take on the whole world when we might have been able to take Iraq without the whole Muslim world wanting to overthrough us?
18
posted on
07/09/2004 12:15:41 PM PDT
by
NraFreedom
(Good Idea!)
To: NraFreedom
"they see it as a virtual replay of the 13th century Mongolian attacks on Bagdad.."
Unfortunately, not.
19
posted on
07/09/2004 12:16:23 PM PDT
by
ZULU
To: zlala
Don't you know that abortion is wrong? It is referred to as murder in the scriptures.
20
posted on
07/09/2004 12:17:09 PM PDT
by
NraFreedom
(Good Idea!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson