Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LandOfLincolnGOP; thoughtomator; rmlew; oceanview
Well it would definitely be worth a shot.

I have a real problem with the attitude-all too often taken by the Republican Party leadership-that dictates that they should not take big risks, which often carry concomitantly, big rewards.

That's one of the reasons that we lose a lot of elections that could have gone our way.

It depresses me to no end that the New York Republican Party couldn't find it in themselves to nominate a real candidate to take on someone as loathsome as Charles Schumer.

31 posted on 07/10/2004 8:41:26 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (Where you are, well, there you is! That's all there is to it. Isn't there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: The Scourge of Yazid
Do you understand anything about politics???

The goal isn't to 'nominate a real candidate to take on someone...'

The goal is to run someone who has a legitimate chance of winning and who can help our cause.

A good example would be Schwarzenegger. Unlike McClintock, who I agree with on nearly everything, Schwarzenegger (obviously) had a legitimate chance of winning and helps our cause more than Cruz Bustamonte would have.
32 posted on 07/10/2004 9:38:31 AM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson