H.Akston wrote:
I have shown that a State can outlaw prostitution.
You have not shown that a state can not outlaw prostitution.
______________________________________
No, you have shown that a State can reasonably regulate the public & commercial aspects of using sex for personal gain between consenting adults.
You have not shown that a state can 'outlaw/prohibit' the private aspects of using sex for personal gain between consenting adults..
"You have not shown that a state can 'outlaw/prohibit' the private aspects of using sex for personal gain between consenting adults.. "
Why confuse the issue with that cluster of weasel words you've strung together, when you deny that a State can outlaw prostitution?
You're asking me to clintonize, and I'd prefer not to. I'm sticking with the actual words you dispute. You denied a state can outlaw prostitution, and so I proved that a state can and does, and proved you to be as wrong as bill clinton.
"No, you have shown that a State can reasonably regulate the public & commercial aspects of using sex for personal gain between consenting adults.
"
Where in the world do you get these weasel words? Stop snivelling and quibbling. Take your thumb out of your mouth.
If you read the section from West Virginia's code I posted, you'll see the word "prostitution", and you'll see that it is illegal, you clown.
You denied that a state can outlaw prostitution, but provided no proof at all.