"Because CA has the 10th Amendment reserved power to 'regulate' assault weapons, according to clowns like H.Akston..."
Yet I said:
"We're in agreement that the Constitution requires CA judges to adhere to the the 2nd Amendment." (338), and I took no position on CA's right to regulate assault weapons.
You say that states can't outlaw prostitution, while calling me a clown! LMAO!!! Can I push your big red nose?
Hugh claims:
California has outlawed prostitution. It has been able to do what you said it couldn't --- Yet, there is no viable court challenge to CA to make prostitution legal. Why?
Because CA has the 10th Amendment reserved power to regulate prostitution.
_____________________________________
California has outlawed assault
weapons, hugh. It has been able to do what you said it couldn't ---
Yet, there is no viable court challenge to CA to make assault weapons legal. Why?
Because CA has the 10th Amendment reserved power to 'regulate' assault weapons, according to clowns like H.Akston, and Sarah Brady, and robertpaulsen, and Steve 802 Mount
.
341 tpaine
______________________________________
Yes, you said:
"We're in agreement that the Constitution requires CA judges to adhere to the the 2nd Amendment."
Now you say CA has the 10th Amendment reserved power to regulate & outlaw individual rights, just as the gun prohibitionists do. -- Make up your mind.
-- The 9th clearly says that both enumerated rights like the 2nd, and our unenumerated rights, [IE, - like using our own bodies] are not to be denied or violated.
States have no powers to 'outlaw' prostitution, -- they can only 'reasonably regulate' such 'sinful' behaviours.