Which part of Judge Perez' historical account of the fraudulency of the 14th Amendment is wrong?
You're the one on the ship that is cutting across your own tow line, as you cheer your captain on.
H.Akston wrote:
Which part of Judge Perez' historical account of the fraudulency of the 14th Amendment is wrong?
______________________________________
Where it said:
"We learned that the 14th Amendment was:
1) fraudulently, unlawfully, illegally proposed by the U.S. Congress rendering it null and void at the outset;
2) ratified in the Southern states by 'rump legislatures', literally by military force at bayonet point — threat, duress and coercion — rendering it null and void in the second instance;
3) had nothing to do with giving freed slaves citizenship status and instead created a new status of citizenship for all Americans (U.S. citizens rather than Citizens of our respective states) which in effect enslaved us all;
4) dissolved and replaced constitutional law with the 'Laws of Commerce and Admiralty'... and
5) in a very real sense became a new constitution within the constitution.