Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
"The Second Amendment was designed to allow states to defend themselves against a possibly tyrannical national government. Now that the federal government has stealth bombers and nuclear weapons, it is hard to imagine what people would need to keep in the garage to serve that purpose."
--Judge Robert Bork

On top of everything else, Bork is a rank hypocrite. This argument is PRECISELY the sort of policy analysis that he (correctly) describes elsewhere as the proper responsibility of elected legislators, not judges.

141 posted on 07/12/2004 10:07:03 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
Here's a case I ran across on the Second Amendment. I don't recall this being discussed here.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY JOE EMERSON (decided April 7, 1999)

CONCLUSION

Because 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Court GRANTS Emerson's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment. A judgment shall be entered in conformity with this opinion.

-- www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/emerson.html

152 posted on 07/12/2004 10:26:26 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson