[BibChr]

< Is screwing other people your idea of good "child-training?" >>

What do you think? We didn't just meet today, sink. Do you really think that was the part on which I was commenting?

But if you like, we can discuss whether it's the state's proper role to mandate insurance coverage for business owners. I say no. But I also think, when you break the law, you deal.

Dan

[Modernman]

But if you like, we can discuss whether it's the state's proper role to mandate insurance coverage for business owners.

It is. Third parties do not assume the risk of being run over by a bulldozer or getting hit by falling lumber. If the government didn't require companies to buy insurance, the rest of society would end up paying for their negligence.

[sinkspur]

But if you like, we can discuss whether it's the state's proper role to mandate insurance coverage for business owners. I say no. But I also think, when you break the law, you deal.

Sorry if I snapped at you, but this guy's whining about his children working is a ruse to get sympathy from his fellow home-schoolers, while he defrauds the state workmen's comp system.

The state has the right to mandate insurance coverage if you are going to be working on my house or on my property. I want to be covered if you wreck my house or kill one of my kids.