[Colofornian]

We'll see now how authentic the "pro-choicers" are...if "pro-choice" is not just a smokescreen for pro-abortion, then the abortion trade and abortion propagandists should be holding press conferences and really being vocal about this case. After all, a woman's right to choice was violated in a supposedly prominent "pro-choice" region of the world.

But listen. Just listen. You don't (and won't) hear anything.

[votelife]

good point. Similar parallel to the feminazi gang sticking up for Slick Willy's shall we say "indiscretions" because he still after all supported abortion on demand.

[pragmatic_asian]

Just to play devil's advocate. The point pro-choicers would make is that she did have a choice and it was to have the baby. They aren't going to protest that because they would say that aren't opposed to anyone choosing to have a baby. Where her choice was removed was when the state doctor over-rode her decision and accidentally/incompetently killed her child. If you don't like the state making that decision one way for you, how can you accept them making a decision the other way? They don't need to protest when others are already doing it.