Skip to comments.
Justice obstructed in the U.S. Senate
Boston Herald ^
| 7/08/04
| Boston Herald editorial staff
Posted on 07/08/2004 2:09:07 AM PDT by kattracks
It's a clear case of obstructing justice, and it ought to be a crime. Problem is, the obstruction is going on in the U.S. Senate. And though he's just a freshman, John Edwards [related, bio] has already become a master of the game.
Yesterday President Bush [related, bio] attempted to blow the whistle - again - on the cynical games being played by Democratic members of the Senate who have held up the nominations of dozens of members of the federal judiciary.
Yesterday Bush visited North Carolina and Michigan where a total of nine vacancies exist on the federal bench because the senators from those states refuse even to grant some nominees a hearing.
All of the nominees, by the way, have been rated well qualified or qualified by the American Bar Association, so competence is not the issue. However, the raw exercise of political partisanship is.
For example, the nomination of Terrence Boyle, chief judge of the federal district court for eastern North Carolina, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit has been pending since May 9, 2001 - thanks entirely to John Edwards.
Eight of the nine nominees have been on hold for more than 1,000 days. In six of those cases the vacancies have created a genuine judicial emergency.
``You're being hung out by a handful of United States senators,'' Bush said he told three of his judicial nominees after meeting with them privately in North Carolina.
In addition to holding up the Boyle nomination, Edwards has delayed confirmation hearings on a federal judgeship for Robert Conrad, a former U.S. attorney in North Carolina. Apparently that's a bit of payback for Conrad urging former Attorney General Janet Reno to appoint a special counsel to investigate Al Gore's 1996 fund-raising.
Imagine the pettiness of a senator acting that way. Imagine that level of pettiness in the White House.
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dems; edwards; judicialnominees; obstructionist; terrenceboyle
1
posted on
07/08/2004 2:09:07 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Oh c'me on. Give the man a break. Edwards has been sooo busy.
/sarcasm
2
posted on
07/08/2004 2:17:42 AM PDT
by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: kattracks
3
posted on
07/08/2004 2:21:19 AM PDT
by
farfromhome
(Was Clinton a good president? That depends on what your definition of 'was' is.)
To: kattracks
4
posted on
07/08/2004 3:14:19 AM PDT
by
samtheman
(www.georgewbush.com)
To: samtheman
I believe that Rove, once Bush is reelected will do everything he can to ensure that there is not another liberal judge appointed to any seat on the bench over the next 20 years.
This game is starting to get serious. In 117 days everyone shows their cards.
5
posted on
07/08/2004 5:24:55 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Hitler? Stalin? The left has a tough decision as to who they would rather emulate.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
from your keyboard to God's ears!
6
posted on
07/08/2004 11:10:38 AM PDT
by
votelife
(Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson