Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrs tiggywinkle

I've been reading comments all day referring to Edwards being sexy. I agree that it has absolutely nothing at all to do with anything, but in all fairness lets face it. If the candidate is homely, we make fun of that, if he's good looking we make fun of that. A candidate is in a no win situation and I think the rhetoric makes us just as shallow as the Dems.


39 posted on 07/07/2004 3:36:37 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Integrityrocks
Thankfully I don't vote by emotion or fickle desires. I use the brain and common sense God gave me. Therefore, I'm voting for the best men for the job: Bush/Cheney

For what it's worth though...Cheney *does* have a voice like liquid velvet that can slice someone at their knees if need be. :o)

52 posted on 07/07/2004 3:57:33 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle (AMERICA, LAND OF THE FREE **BECAUSE** OF THE BRAVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Integrityrocks

Appearance *does* matter. The most famous example is when Nixon showed up for a debate with JFK sweating and with 5 o'clock shadow.
Most often, the tallest candidate wins. Certainly, the teeny ones (like Dukakis) have had problems almost impossible to overcome.

Being the most attractive candidate is probably worth 3-4% of the vote. W got his share for being cuter than algore. I think he's got the edge over Kerry this time, too.

If Edwards looks like he'll get the "cute" vote from Cheney, they can send out Rummy. He's got quite a following, even in Liberal circles.


87 posted on 07/07/2004 5:05:20 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson