Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NutCrackerBoy
We've had this discussion many, many times, with asses probably even more stubborn than you, and I have no desire to do it again. Let me give the short version:

Q: Copyright blah blah
US: Fair use blah blah
Q: But but, I read somewhere...blah blah.
Us: No supreme court ruling. Issue not settled. It's Jim Robinson's board and he's all for it. Go start your own board if you disagree. Blah blah blah.

Did I leave anything out, guys?

45 posted on 07/08/2004 12:03:59 AM PDT by Defiant (Moore-On: That throbbing anticipation felt by a liberal hoping for America's defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant; quidnunc
I understand your (excerpted) argument on whether or not excerpting is required, and that is an ongoing debate. But regardless of whether something is excerpted, the link is provided so that you can do the right thing and go to the source. You have absolutely zero ethical leg to stand on if you are holding that it is proper for you never to follow the links.
47 posted on 07/08/2004 12:20:31 AM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson