[AlbionGirl]

Personally, I am certain Saddam was up to his ears in 9/11.

You can believe anything you want, but in order to make it work in a debate, it has to amount to more than a 'belief.'

But that being said, as I posted to Valin, I'm fine with your agreement with the War. My view differs, and we'll just have to leave it there because I've made my case as to why, and I don't think it's a poorly thought out or frivolous one. Good people can disagree on this issue.

[thoughtomator]

Even without sharing my belief that Saddam was a sponsor of 9/11, the fact remains that on 9/11 the possibility of WMD terrorism was laid bare for us to deal with. Given that possibility, a hostile but remote threat like Saddam was no longer remote.

Ask yourself this question: What do you think will happen if a nuke goes off in Washington DC, and nobody claims responsibility?