So, if we are paying attention to Catherine Crier, it looks like Geragos' next big thing will be to try to pin this murder on the female meth addict who stole those credit card "checks" from Scott's warehouse mailbox. Or he'll try to say she had some male associates who are somehow implicated.
It occurs to me, though, that Laci and her belongings would have probably provided people with no clue that she was married to someone who had a warehouse at that address. Any address mentioned in HER personal effects would have been her home address.
And suppose this meth addict (name: Taberna) did know about the missing woman's connection to the warehouse mailbox from which she was now stealing mail?
If you or your associates had committed the GRUESOME, HORRIFYING murder of a pregnant woman in Dec., would YOU go anywhere near the husband of the dead woman? Wouldn't that be too much of a risk? Wouldn't you, rather, make sure that you were GONE, disappeared, unable to be found, and make a point of never bringing yourself anywhere near the crime scene, or the office of the victim's husband?
I mean, if this woman had murdered Laci, it is very unlikely that she is then going to bring EXTREME HEAT down on herself by stealing from that victim's husband two months later.
The majority of thieving addicts that I've seen steal more from their family and friends. This is because they know those people are less likely to call the police on them. These people wouldn't steal from someone against whom they've already committed a horrendous crime. They don't want to go to prison--they want to get away with it!
Here's an idea based on something I read on another forum.
We have a supposed report that Laci used the bathroom of a woman at the warehouse, either on Dec. 20, or Dec. 23. This alleged witness does not provide proof that Laci went into Scott's warehouse on one of those dates; she only purports to prove that Laci went into HER bathroom on one of those dates.
What if Laci was asking to use the woman's bathroom b/c Laci was there at the warehouses without Scott? I mean, if Laci went by there w/o Scott, she probably didn't have a key to get into Scott's warehouse.
Why would Laci go by there w/o Scott? Checking up on him. Wifely snooping. Maybe it was her checking up on him (when he KNEW she might really find evidence of his affair) that made him angry enough to kill her.
I think he is really on the Renfro/watch stealing, homeless thieves connection....Shady people in the neighborhood...The Crier show was not my cup of tea...we don't even know if it was Laci's watch..The check stealing happened at the warehouse mailbox after Laci's disappearance I believe...
I think the Posecutors are going to have to have an objection to some of Geragos's unrelated cross exams .In the defense case one must have more than Geragos has shown to present another suspect.