To: McGruff
They were still vetting, late last night?????
To: A Citizen Reporter
5 posted on
07/06/2004 4:49:01 PM PDT by
McGruff
To: A Citizen Reporter
They were still vetting, late last night?????Oh, good Gawd Almighty, the Kerry campaign is a train wreck in progress...
8 posted on
07/06/2004 4:50:15 PM PDT by
Poohbah
("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
To: A Citizen Reporter
Graham failed the vetting process! What does that mean? Graham has some unknown skeleton in his closet? Maybe he violated the rule that a politician should not get caught with a dead girl or a live boy.
To: A Citizen Reporter
They didn't set up the websites by this morning. They were scrambling.
12 posted on
07/06/2004 4:52:01 PM PDT by
AmishDude
(Don't Drink and FReep. You might spill beer on your keyboard.)
To: A Citizen Reporter
The signs that they had this morning had Kerry-Edwards on one side and Kerry-Graham on the other!!!
13 posted on
07/06/2004 4:52:21 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: A Citizen Reporter
I can't believe he named anyone yet. I expected the announcement at the convention. Now, there is no reason at all to watch.
19 posted on
07/06/2004 4:54:21 PM PDT by
Feiny
(I can resist anything but temptation.)
To: A Citizen Reporter
Edwards was not even 2nd choice if you consider the Dem / McCain wetdream of McCain as Veep.
27 posted on
07/06/2004 4:56:12 PM PDT by
Swanks
To: A Citizen Reporter
Vetting-what's vetting? Forget I asked, I don't want to know.
He wanted McCain, he wound up with Edwards. Like all over the hill whores, Kerry was happy to get any old John.
107 posted on
07/06/2004 6:21:30 PM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
(John the gigolo and John the Schmo-hee hee hee and ho ho ho!!!! Hey Curley and Larry! Where's Moe??)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson