Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2004 4:15:03 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yoe

I sense we are witnessing the beginning of the destruction of the Democratic party. Heheheh.


2 posted on 07/06/2004 4:17:36 PM PDT by EggsAckley ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Evita Rodham Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
"By choosing John Edwards over Dick Gephardt, the Democrats today transferred power in their party from the labor unions to the trial lawyers."

Norquist is correct about the trial lawyers, but I believe he has overlooked the all-powerful Government Unions - this is where the labor unions' power base has transferred. And the teachers unions and the huge NEA, which has nothing to do with real education, it is all about money for their union in order to “vote” their candidate into office, in this case Kerry...like trial lawyers, they vote their pocket book, not for America.

3 posted on 07/06/2004 4:21:18 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
By choosing John Edwards over Dick Gephardt, the Democrats today transferred power in their party from the labor unions to the trial lawyers."

If this was part of Kerry's calculation in picking Edwards, it's a bit of a no-brainer. The labor unions are shrinking in numbers and dollars, whereas the trial lawyers are increasing their earnings, some of which they contribute to the Dems.

4 posted on 07/06/2004 4:22:52 PM PDT by Vision Thing (Kerry-Edwards: For men and women who vote under the influence of their own estrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
By choosing John Edwards over Dick Gephardt, the Democrats today transferred power in their party from the labor unions to the trial lawyers."

I think most people who pay attention knows that the labor unions have not been the Demorats power base for a while. They still get lots of votes from them, but the unions like the blacks have started to figure out that the Demorats are all about Demorats and one one else.

6 posted on 07/06/2004 4:26:39 PM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
He'd have as much clout in the party as Jimmy Carter."

And, that amounts to peanuts!

9 posted on 07/06/2004 4:33:27 PM PDT by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Has Norquist taken a break from kissing the butts of Islamists long enough to think this through and write it?


13 posted on 07/06/2004 4:54:18 PM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

And, when these 'Establishment' Democrats step into the voting booth, may we count on their support, there behind the closed curtain, as they make a checkmark beside the Bush/Cheney Electors' entry on the ballot?

But that would be counting on lifelong Democrats to be doing the right thing. Always an uncertain proposition.


16 posted on 07/06/2004 5:22:42 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Even if sKerry/Fratboy win (*GAAK*) Shrillary will get what she wants...first biologically female Chief Justice.


17 posted on 07/06/2004 5:24:15 PM PDT by clintonh8r ("Just because I could.......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
told NewsMax.com in an exclusive interview

So exclusive that he gave the same interview to FNC twenty minutes later.

19 posted on 07/06/2004 5:45:56 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War (we use the ¡°ml maximize¡± command in Stata to obtain estimates of each aj , bj, and cm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Republicans are going to be in for a big surprise on election day if the Democrats are able to get out a large voter turnout! Norquist's reasoning if perfectly logical but not very realistic, in my opinion.

Tune in to C-SPAN any morning, and you'll hear every stripe of Democratic thinking from far-leftists to blacks, gays, and especially nearly all women callers. They HATE GWB with a passion, and would vote for anybody to see a Democrat win the White House in November, and perhaps even one or both houses of the Congress.

President Bush should be running scared, but from what I read in Human Reports recently, mostly liberal Repulicans are going to be prime time speakers at the convention. Is Sen. Rick Santorum going to be able to speak? If not, Pennsylvania may go Democratic. How about Senators Mike DeWine and George Voinovich of Ohio. No Republican has won the White House without carrying Ohio. Both states are up for grabs, and all it will take is for a large turnout of Democratic voters.


20 posted on 07/06/2004 5:46:29 PM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

I stopped listening to Norquist ever since he, as an advocate of Reagean on the 10 dollar bill, said that the 10 was the only bill picturing somoene who is not a president.


22 posted on 07/06/2004 6:04:24 PM PDT by FreeBSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Except from CFIF ORG
About Edwards and Trial Lawyers;
Those lawsuits are estimated to cost every man, woman and child in this country $650 a year, but in the world of John Edwards and his cronies at the trough, it is infinitely better for us to give that money to trial lawyers than spend it on SUVs, which may roll over on us, or Big Macs, which may make us fat.


23 posted on 07/06/2004 6:11:13 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Living here in Ohio, and seeing ALL (minimum 5 per night) the anti-Bush ads, and seeing NOTHING from the pro-Bush side, I would hope that someone of Norquist's stature would maybe try to start putting some money together for some anti-Kerry 527s.

It's Politics 101: a charge not denied is a charge confirmed. After months of relentless pounding about (to take one example) "tax breaks for sending jobs overseas" the average voter will start to believe it's true.

The Bush campaign is getting pounded and they don't even seem to care.
24 posted on 07/06/2004 6:31:09 PM PDT by cincy29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Grover missed something, to no FREEPERS surprise the NEA endorsed Kerry/Edwards today


25 posted on 07/06/2004 9:36:36 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
"By choosing John Edwards over Dick Gephardt, the Democrats today transferred power in their party from the labor unions to the trial lawyers. Like Kerry, Edwards has a nasty record of voting against taxpayers," Norquist explained. "In six short years he has amassed an anti-taxpayer record rivaling both Kerry and the other Massachusetts senator, Kennedy. Edwards voted against the 2001 and 2003 tax relief plans, voted 12 times against repealing the marriage penalty, 8 times against repealing the Death Tax, against the per-child tax credit, against suspending the gasoline tax, and is an ardent protectionist. In the last six years, if a policy was good for taxpayers, Edwards was on the wrong side every time," said Norquist.
...and we should be surprised why? ;')
George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent

29 posted on 07/06/2004 11:43:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson